1st of all, take the Native Americans..........the Indians..............who look very similar to the peoples fo the West Indies............Borneo, Sumatra...........Papa New Guinea, etc................and explorers from China, Korea, Japan, or Mongolia............they had to cross the entire Pacific ocean..........now look at how far Africa is from the Americas..........in Mexico's Yucatan penn., u are not far from West Africa...........Brazil juts into the South Atlantic, towards West Africa...........West Africa juts into the South Atlantic towards Brazil.............the Eastern part of the Carribean islands are very close to the Canary Islands, etc..............off the coast of West Africa.....................with the human race being from East Africa...............the oldest skeletons........we have to go with the available evidence...........i bet the Africans were 1st..............it is only logical...........as Spock would say..........



Those kingdoms were connected...........and i bet there were negroid kingdoms in the now USA, and just about everywhere south of here in the Americas...

Pharaohs connected to Tunisia by Egypt[edit]

Evidence of habitation in the North African region by human ancestors has been found stretching back one or two million years, yet not to rival those most-ancient finds in south and east Africa.^[4] Remains of Homo erectus during the Middle Pleistocene, circa 750 kya(thousands of years ago), has been found in North Africa. These were associated with the change in early hominid tool use form pebble-choppers to hand-axes.^[5]

Migrations out of south and east Africa since 100 kya are thought to have established current human populations world wide.^[6] Cavalli-Sforza includes the Berber populations in a much larger genetic group, one which also includes S.W. Asians, Iranians, Europeans, Sardinians, Indians, S.E. Indians, and Lapps.^[7]

"[B]y definition prehistoric archaeology is dealing with pre-written sources only, so that all prehistory is anonymous." Hence, "it is inevitably mainly concerned with the material culture" such as "stone tools, bronze weapons, hut foundations, tombs, field walks, and the like." ... "We have no way of learning the moral and religious ideas of the protohistoric city dwellers... ."^[8]

Regarding the evidence of prehistory, very remote epochs often give clues only about physical anthropology, i.e., per biological remains re human evolution. Usually the later millennia progressively disclose more and more cultural information yet, absent writings, it is mostly limited to "material culture". Generally cultural data is considered a far more telling indication of prehistoric human behavior and society, as compared to only evidence of physical human remains.^[9]

The cultural data available about human prehistory derived from material artifacts, however, too often directly concerns "non-essentials". It is limited as a useful source about the finer details of archaic human societies—the ethical norms, the individual dilemmas—when compared to the data from written sources. "When prehistorians speak of the ideas and ideals of men before writing, they are making guesses--intelligent guesses by people best qualified to make them, but nevertheless guesses."^[10][11]

Perhaps the most significant prehistoric finding worldwide concerns events surrounding the neolithic revolution. Then humans developed significant jumps in cognitive ability. The evidence of the art and expressive artifacts dating back about 10 to 12 kya show a new sophistication in handling experience, perhaps being the fruits of prior advances in the articulation of symbols and language. Herding and farming develop. A new phase of human evolution had begun.^[12][13] "The rich heritage of rock painting in North Africa... seem to date after the Pleistocene period... around