Ok, sheer physics, maybe caused this, sometimes it isn't a question of if it was lifted but by how much, and so the vague wording at times, for one, to an extent makes sense, b/c of all the myriad things that can go wrong in a match.
The sheer physics i am talking about, the ball itself is raised, it was not deflated, like a basketball, it inflated, with air, or some type of air, not sure what pressured air is in those machines, mixed with regular air they might add stuff, some type of gas, substance, i am not sure, but it IS bouncy, his foot seems to ricochet up a bit, a degree of up. More than it would have been, if his foot had not hit the ball.
There has to be leeway, incidental contact, and the players, the refs should be given a degree of error, the benefit of the doubt. I have seen the Nfl refs admit to their mistakes and apologize, but if we reverse every decision, unless in some provable cheating, collusion, favoritism, or something.
Mistakes are going to happen, it goes back to intent for me, and if they change one match for one team, the Usa, one player, why not the other 47 teams, 87 or so matches, etc?
Favoritism, it is obvious, feet bounce off a bouncy ball, that is how it looked to me, but to an extent violent, but u cannot fault a player's attempt to play the ball, the game, sports in general, at their very essence, is a competition, and we are all human, so it comes foremost to intent, i make mistakes too, i have bad eye sight, so the golden goal was not just a mls thing, as i heard on a latino channel, but all over fifa, but for a brief time.
And the wording, i am getting at things can be made better, and it is important to understand the scope of things, it should be fair, the cup should be moved, Canada should have had the 1st match and the last, it is only fair, how is THAT not favortism towards Mexico and the usa?
Comments
Post a Comment