Friday, December 4, 2015

Which may or may not be true.................as for the reason they left in 900 ad...................but if another civilization in 900 ad Mexico.........up and left at the same time..........


Human sacrifice[edit]

Critics claim that human sacrificesdepicted in the film are more similar toAztec practices than to Mayan.
Apocalypto has been criticized for portraying a type of human sacrifice which was more typical of the Aztecs than of the MayaArchaeologist Lisa Lucero said, "the classic Maya really didn't go in for mass sacrifice. That was the Aztecs."[13] Anthropology professor Karl Taube argued that, "We know the Aztecs did that level of killing. Their accounts speak of 20,000."[54] According to the film's technical advisor, the film was meant to describe the post-classic period of the Maya when fiercer influences like the Toltecs and Aztecs arrived. According to Hansen, "We know warfare was going on. The Postclassic center of Tulum is a walled city; these sites had to be in defensive positions. There was tremendous Aztec influence by this time. The Aztecs were clearly ruthless in their conquest and pursuit of sacrificial victims, a practice that spilled over into some of the Maya areas."[11]Anthropology professor Stephen Houston made the criticism that sacrifice victims were more likely to be royalty and elites rather than common forest dwellers, as shown in Apocalypto.[54] In contrast, Associate Professor William R. Fowler states that for major favors, worshippers "offered the gods human sacrifice, usually children, slaves, or prisoners of war".[55] Anthropology professor Karl Taube criticized the film's apparent depiction of widespread slavery, saying, "We have no evidence of large numbers of slaves."[54] Another disputed scene, when Jaguar Paw and the rest of captives are used as target practice, was acknowledged by the filmmakers to be invented as a plot device for igniting the chase sequence.[13] Someanthropologists objected to the presence of a huge pit filled with rotting corpses near the fields of the Maya.[56] Hansen states that this is "conjecture", saying that "all [Gibson was] trying to do there is express the horror of it".[13]
The Washington Post reported that the famous Bonampak murals were digitally altered to show a warrior holding a dripping human heart, which is not present in the original.[57]

No comments:

Post a Comment