When Picasso Almost Invented Abstract Painting
It
took four hours by train and seven hours by covered wagon to reach
Cadaqués from Barcelona. The group of travelers—including a 28-year-old
and his then lover, Fernande Olivier—arrived in the small Spanish beach town after nightfall on July 1, 1910.
and his then lover, Fernande Olivier—arrived in the small Spanish beach town after nightfall on July 1, 1910.
Picasso
would produce just a handful of works that summer, 10 of which are
extant today. For the famously prolific artist, whose total output is
estimated at 50,000 works, this was an aberration. Just the summer
before, in the Spanish village of Horta de San Joan, Picasso produced
what biographer John Richardson calls an “avalanche of paintings.”
“It’s
always interesting to note when he actually slows down,” said Yve-Alain
Bois, a professor of art history at the Institute for Advanced Study in
Princeton, New Jersey. In this case, he noted, “I think Picasso knew
that his work had pushed him into a corner.”
The preceding years had been wildly productive for Picasso. In 1907, together with French painter
, he began to lay the foundation for
. The pair collaborated more intensively in 1909, a back-and-forth that led to the development of “Analytic Cubism”—characterized by fragmented, overlapping planes and a monochromatic palette.
, he began to lay the foundation for
. The pair collaborated more intensively in 1909, a back-and-forth that led to the development of “Analytic Cubism”—characterized by fragmented, overlapping planes and a monochromatic palette.
In
his beach-side studio in Cadaqués, Picasso continued to pare down his
mark-making. Eventually, he settled on a structure of gridded
perpendicular lines that would serve as the basis for each new work. He
also began to shade each plane of the fragmented picture separately,
rather than maintaining a single light source—an approach that created a
sense of depth without the illusion of a solid form.
These
developments were driving him closer and closer towards pure
abstraction. Even Picasso, Richardson notes, had a difficult time
identifying the original subject matter for the Cadaqués paintings.
Beyond their titles, Femme à la mandoline (Woman with a mandolin) (1910) and Glass and Lemon
(1910) are difficult to parse as anything other than a series of
interlocking geometric planes in shades of brown and gray. “These works
seem abstract in all but name,” wrote Museum of Modern Art curator Leah Dickerman in a catalogue essay for the museum’s 2012–13 exhibition “Inventing Abstraction.”
And if Picasso had
embraced this direction in his art, his would have been among the first
Western paintings to be truly abstract. While this accolade is, and
likely will always be, contested,
—often hailed as the “father of abstract painting”—didn’t display his first non-representational painting until December 1911.
—often hailed as the “father of abstract painting”—didn’t display his first non-representational painting until December 1911.
But
pure abstraction remained, as Richardson puts it, “a Rubicon [Picasso]
would never cross.” When the Spanish painter returned to Paris in late
August, he changed course. “It’s true that whatever Picasso felt about
those works, he decided to stop this vein, to amend it shortly
afterwards,” Bois explained.
Pablo Picasso
Portrait of Art Dealer Ambroise Vollard (1867-1939), Spring 1910
Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow
The
artist may have been influenced by his primary dealer, Daniel-Henry
Kahnweiler, who evidently declined to purchase all but one of the works
he’d made that summer. A 1910 portrait of Kahnweiler, begun before
Picasso’s trip to Cadaqués and completed after he’d returned to France,
reveals the new direction Picasso’s art would take. He began to add
“attributes” to his paintings—a tie, a pipe, an ear lobe—small signs
that indicated what object was being represented.
Later,
in the 1920s, Picasso began to publicly decry abstraction. Bois notes
that, as far as he knows, Picasso had made no comment on the style
before that point. The comments came “precisely when abstract art was
making some kind of noise and he felt a bit of a threat,” he explained.
“The threat being: I’m no longer the most avant garde there is.”
In
a 1928 interview, Picasso declared: “I have a horror of so-called
abstract painting.…When one sticks colors next to each other and traces
lines in space that don’t correspond to anything, the result is
decoration.” The floodgates had opened; in 1935, the painter opined:
“There is no abstract art. You must always start with something.
Afterwards you can remove all trace of reality. There’s no danger
then…because the idea of the object left an indelible mark.”
A
third argument, which came later, held that it was impossible to
entirely eliminate a painting’s subject. “Even if the canvas is green—so
what? In that case the subject matter is greenness!”
But
despite these outward rejections of abstraction, Picasso would revisit
the style in sketches periodically throughout his life—often
corresponding to a particular exhibition or artist’s work that he’d just
seen. “Each time, it’s almost to reassure himself,” said Bois. “Like,
‘Oh, I can make the same stuff as these people.’ You can sense there’s
some kind of anxiety.”
Although Picasso himself may never have gone fully abstract, Cubism certainly inspired a generation of painters like
and
(although not the “expressionist” wing of abstraction, represented by Kandinsky). Mondrian spoke publicly about that influence, saying once that “Cubism did not accept the logical consequences of its own discoveries.”
and
(although not the “expressionist” wing of abstraction, represented by Kandinsky). Mondrian spoke publicly about that influence, saying once that “Cubism did not accept the logical consequences of its own discoveries.”
Maybe the most important
lesson from Picasso’s summer in Cadaqués, however, is that breaking the
boundary between figuration and abstraction was no easy feat. “I thought
that it was a very interesting thing,” Bois mused. “If someone as
fearless as Picasso could recoil in front of the possibility of
abstraction, how much more difficult would that have been for everyone
else?”
No comments:
Post a Comment